Jesse Jane Online Streaming

In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

1. The IVF is an assisted reproduction technique in which oocytes are fertilized with sperm in the laboratorio.Los embryos obtained were transferred into the uterus of the female with the intention of initiating a pregnancy.
IVF is a complex, expensive, not without risk for women of limited effectiveness, ethically unacceptable and can become a business that exploits the feelings of women willing to have a child.
may be homologous (gametes: egg and sperm come from the husbands) or heterologous (at least one gamete donors come from different husbands).
is estimated at 5 million number of people around the world who have born with this técnica.En in 2010 was awarded the Nobel Prize to RGEdwards medicanes, father of the IVF technique and succeeded in 1978 the conception and birth of the first test tube baby in the UK called Loise Brown (technique IVF had been used in veterinary medicine since the 50).
Because of the importance and topicality of interest we have found this publication, aimed at a general audience is this technique.

2. The cost of IVF is low and carries a high number of embryos sacrificed . The results vary greatly depending on the experience of the center that performs and the age of mujer.Consiguen have a baby per cycle 1 in 4 women who are detected in only the IVF success rate down to about 5% when the woman is over 40 years of age. And get between 4-8 births per 100 embryos created .

3. IVF is not without risk for women egg donor. It should be noted the "ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): ovarian excessive growth after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to get the eggs needed for IVF .. The mature egg retrieval is performed by laparoscopic and can be time-consuming and troublesome for women.

4. For the egg donation and sperm in Spain is a "economic compen-sation" :30-40 € for the sperm sample and 600 € for the donation of ova. Couples detected in only a benefit that IVF-entre5.000 pay € 8,000 (for each attempt at fertilization) .

5. IVF compared to natural methods of birth control .
Natural methods (Billings method) are highly effective for both pregnancy and to search posponerlo.En a 2007 study by the Dra.Martínez Irazusta in 60 women (50 diagnosed infertility and waiting list for assisted reproduction techniques): 40 became pregnant in an interval of 6 months (66.6% success), as published in the journal "Mission" n º 19, p.44. The success rate for achieving pregnancy was 32% in natural fertility consultation in the La Paz hospital in Madrid (Alpha and Omega Weekly 20/11/2008).
natural methods, besides being more effective than IVF, pose no economic cost as well as being safe and enjoyable ... but not considered "politically correct."

6. The business of IVF : in "Medical Journal" (21-6-2007) reflected the statements of Robert Winston (Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and a British expert on fertility) in which he condemned the IVF industry because, he said, is being corrupted by money-giving and their doctors are exploiting women desperate zadas.Así pregnant stay the same, according to published "ABC" (01/07/2007), U.S. (in the Abraham Center of Life, of San Antonio, Texas) can get "embryos à la carte" for $ 10,000. The infertile couple comes to the embryo bank, called the "catalog" and select the desired embryo according to the characteristics of egg donors and espermatozoides.También provide surrogate mothers in the event that the mother did not want the embryo implanted chosen.! could not be easier! ... as if the embryo (a human being with all the dignity of the person) were a commodity any .
artificial insemination centers "forget", however, one important aspect: the prevention of infertility (perhaps because it is not profitable?).

7. IVF is not ethically acceptable. Following the Prof.R.Lucas
ethical trial on artificial insemination is based on three points:
A. Respect for the human embryo, which does not occur in IVF because the embryo is reified, regardless of their personal dignity
B. The nature of human sexuality and the act conyugal.La IVF is immoral because it profoundly, you divide the marital sexual act unitive dimension and not immorality procreativa.La requirement due to a "religious", but the objective fact that this contradicts an integral anthropology division
C. The unit family. IVF parent-child relationships are trastocan.El extreme case for a test-tube baby can be have three mothers (biological, legal and carrier) and two parents (biological and legal)
in the instruction "Dignitas personae" on the origin of human life (published in XII/2008) Church Catholic establishes two criteria for assessing the ethics of assisted reproduction: 1.The
human being should be respected and treated as a person from the moment of conception
2.The conjugal act is worthy of truly responsible procreation
You should not allow human beings (and the embryo is) are treated as "things" that can be produced, handled or comercializar.Las people should not be produced in laboratories, but procreated by binding interpersonal esposos.El ends never justify the means.

8. Other negative aspects of IVF :
A. IVF may occur that siblings become parents later in the same child, with the risk of inherited diseases that entails
B. Being a "person test tube and psychological risks involved" co biological incest "(carnal intercourse between relatives)
C . The implantation of multiple embryos (for "secure" the child) causes high rates of multiple pregnancies and premature births, with negative impacts on offspring
D. IVF threatening human and social ecology as siblings can reach marriage (in Australia 30 women in a small city have children of the same biological father: weekly Alpha and Omega 20-11-2008)
E. The desire for someone to have a child can not override this fundamental right to know who their biological parent (very well regarded by society in the case of adopted children), which violates the heterologous IVF births
F. Do not apply to human reproductive cells the same legal and moral we give to a donor organ for transplantation (because the gametes do give rise to a new life, unique and different article of the parents)

9. The "right" to the child against the rights of the child .
There is no "right" to have a child hijo.El, however (for their personal dignity from the moment of conception), it does have the right to be treated with the utmost dignity and not as if "something" (which can produce "serial" or market manipulation). People should not be produced in laboratories, but procreated in the context of marriage esposos.Conviene interpersonal stress that the child is a gift, not a right or a product.

10. In defense of the weaker .
In conclusion I wish to refer back to the instruction "Dignitas personae" which states that the Church feels the duty to voice ... "who do not, and appealed" to all people good will "to" defend the fragile human condition in the early stages of his life. "Defend, ultimately, to the weakest person who is the embryo.

RECOMMENDED READING AND WEBSITES
-Instruction "Dignitas Personae" (12-12-2008) on some bioethical issues
-conferenciaepiscopal.es: documents of the EEC
-View on embryos entries in this blog especially entitled "Embryo and Human Dignity"
-ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a 19 años.E.Amestoy et al. Clinical Medicine 135:720,2010 artificial.En
-fertilization: "Explain bioethics ". R.Lucas.Ed.Palabra, 2007
-Playing asistida.En:" Basic Issues of bioethics "p.167.A.Pardo.Ed.Rialp, 2010
asistida.En-reproduction techniques," Bioethics personalistic ": science and controversy and E.Postigo.Ed.Internacionales p.201.GMTomás University, 2007
-The alleged" right to a child ", children and orphans laboratory López.Semanario biológicos.M.Martínez-Alpha and 11/20/2008 Omega-
asistida.En reproduction techniques, "In defense of the family" p.178.B.Blanco.Ed.Espasa, 2010
-Preblemas ethical selection of embryos for therapeutic purposes ca . E.Collazo.Cuadernos Bioethics 21 (72): 231.2010
-aebioetica.org: English Society of Bioethics
-bioeticaweb.com
-observatoriobioetica.com: Life Sciences Institute (UCV)
-bioeticahoy.com.es

Kmap Tom Tom Portugal

Is gay marriage a fundamental and universal?

- No, not es.Según the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg on marriage is the union between a man and a woman, and no European state is obliged to admit (statement released 6/25/2010). The European Convention on Human Rights does not oblige a state to extend marriage rights to couples homosexuales.El recognition of homosexual marriage comes under the sovereignty of each State.

- English anomaly is observed in the European context the view that homosexual marriage is a derecho.Cabe realized that human rights imply equal treatment for those who are equal, but the homosexual metrimonio which is the same strata as the that are different, so can not speak of a universal right (forumlibertas.com :28-6, 2010).

- France has recently rejected gay marriage and regulates such couples through what she calls the Solidridad Civil Pact adopted in 1999 (ABC 1/29/2011). According LRJospin (prime minister of France from 1997 and 2002) two different things can not be treated the same way and marriage between heterosexual couples Homosexuals are different (forumlibertas.com :31-1-2011).

- Zapatero's Spain is an anomaly in Europe and the world because it is one of the few countries not only approve gay marriage sini also allows adoption by same-sex couples (along with the Netherlands, Canada and South Africa .)

- Although the above is intended to introduce in the European Union "harmonizing border" means that Member States would be obliged to recognize same-sex unions the same level as marriage but no such recognition in the respective country's legal system (and is collected in the "report Berlinger" presented at Parliament on 11.28.2010). According to legal experts if this report was approved would violate seriously the principle of subsidiarity, fundamental principle key European Union (forumlibertas.com :29-11-2010)

Labeled Electric Motor

EUTHANASIA (E)

• E: is defined as the act or omission with intent to kill to a terminally ill to end their sufrimiento.Actualmente is permitted in the Netherlands, Belgium and in the state of Oregon . In Spain there are voices in favor of approval, which is why it seems appropriate to publish these comments.
• means suicide assisted the situation midway between the E. and raises suicidio.Se like a choice in the life of the people, freedom of expression is intended that this course individuo.Se law prevails over the professionalism of doctors, which should assist the patient who requests it by providing appropriate means. The
• campaigns for the E. are aimed at manipulating public opinion the following strategy:
• exaggerating maximum publicity to limit demand on the E.
• present increasingly less dramatic cases until the public sees E. as "normal"
• described as "reactionary and intransigent" defenders of life, and "progressive" promoters of the E.
• convey the false idea that E. is a religious issue, and as no one should impose on others their ideas should be accepted in a society that do not support plural.Los E. be categorized as "fundamentalists"

Arguments
• anti-E. for social debate:
• makes no sense to raise the E. having palliative care quality control difficult manifestations of terminal patients.
• In countries where E. is legalized, the practice tends to expand more and more.-called phenomenon of the "slippery slope." eg in the Netherlands has moved from the strict requirements of the uncontrolled circulation (including newborns).
• Legalizing E. creates an intolerable pressure on certain groups defenseless (elderly, chronic, terminal ...) that feel almost obliged to apply in certain situations.
• Legalizing E. in a perverse way disrupts the function of the physician and may turn against the profession, ruining the relationship of dialogue and trust medical paciente.Supondría a new "model" of medicine, which is already noticeable in some Dutch hospitals.
• It is of great social importance legalize E. it means recognizing the right of doctors to have the lives of others personas.Afecta to all citizens and not just the patient who requested it.
• E. hampers medical research: does it make sense to spend much effort and financial resources to provide good palliative care if lethal injection with a simple "remove" the problem?. In fact, in Holland, palliative care are very little resources are desarrollados.Los limited ... and the temptation is to restrict attention to certain groups.
• E. Applying We have made a double injustice: to kill a person and not having previously cured the depression that led him to apply.
• What really solve the E:?. The E. does not help to resolve the major issues surrounding end of life: not in the family (which still has its pain) or in the patient (not really feel wanted or appreciated or helpful to others.)
• life of man, for his enormous dignity, can not be removed by anyone in a modern, developed democratic.
• Because when someone requests the taking of his life ... what is really asking is that you take away the pain and accompanying him on his soledad.Por that laverdadera alternative to E. is the humanization of death and quality of palliative care.

• The doctrine Catholic on the E. is clear and is perfectly expressed in the encyclical Evangeliuem vitae of John Paul II :"... the E. is a serious violation of the law of God as the deliberate and morally unacceptable for an individual. "

• To finish these comments, remember that there are several international provisions contrary to the E., eg: European Convention on Human Rights ("death can not be inflicted on anyone intentionally.")

The Renderers - Monsters And Miasmas

Reflections on human embryo

The current debate on the ethical permissibility of using embryos for research reflects important aspects of scientific mentality.
Researchers have an insatiable desire to know. When conquering a frontier, then raised how to get to the next. When curing a disease, then seek strategies to heal others or to "cushion" if that were possible, the same natural process of aging that irreversibly affects all human beings.
cutting-edge medical research wants to find the solution to many degenerative diseases. The stem cell research (also called stem) provides, in that sense, high hopes. These stem cells can come from embryos (in the early stages of development), or humans more developed (fetuses, children, adults). It is usually possible to obtain embryonic stem cells from the death or destruction of the embryos used in such experiments, unless they develop safer techniques to avoid any damage to the embryo of such cells are taken.
based research adult stem cells in itself poses no serious ethical objections. Instead, we discuss extensively on the ethical legitimacy of using embryonic stem cells, because obtaining such cells involves destroying or harming embryos.

"human embryos are" subhuman "?

Some argue, is informative level, is a scientific level, the character "subhuman" of those embryos. Since 1984 there arose the term "pre-embryo" to describe the embryo in its earliest stages of life, meaning, to that end, we are dealing with a "prehombre." Society can
scared if they hear that the research destroys human beings. The company, however, is more at ease if they are told they are being used (and destroyed) pre-embryos in the laboratory.
A study published in early September 2007 by the British authorities for the Fertilization and Embryology (short English is HFEA) clearly shows that the "use" of embryos is accepted when it can convince the public character of such sub-human embryos before they get to meet 14 days of development.

"Overall, any extra ..."

Another argument is put forward in favor of embryo research is that many of them are destined to an inevitable death. In the artificial reproduction clinics "leftover" embryos. Many parents are unwilling or unable to provide an opportunity to continue their existence as other human embryos.
Why not use them, if they are destined to certain death? For some scientists, are "biological material" very interesting, well used, will be used to discover and enhance modern medicine. Some even say they take these embryos is to give meaning to his death, offering a "dignified" to inevitable destruction purchase a humanitarian value to give hope to many patients awaiting help from science.
not lacking, however, scientists, bioethicists, lawyers, thinkers and philosophers who openly advocate that every embryo is a human being from the moment of fertilization. These authors believe, therefore, that the embryo must be protected: not just destroy it or damage to allow "progress" scientific.
No human being is worth less than others. No human being can be destroyed for the good of other human beings.
Those who wish to use embryos attack these authors as not serious. They think that proponents of embryo use religious or unscientific prejudices. Some authors who want to experiment on embryos say decisively that the early stages of our lives were not more than a disorganized cluster of cells with no value, and little by little he forged a more complex structure that allowed one day (do not become agree to say exactly what) on the emergence of a human being who then began to earn respect and protection.
It is difficult to give an answer to a complex discussion. There are many interests involved, and perhaps this should be the first item to consider.

examine who has interests

What's in those who defend the dignity (the value) of the embryo? It seems that very little. The child is born, or not to destroy an embryo, does not produce a great benefit to a philosopher or a scientist who defend the embryo.
What do they gain, however, those who attack the dignity of the embryo? A laboratory may make a lot, so it may request more funding for research, will be quoted on the stock, you get fame, perhaps patent a certain new drugs or even (where not prohibited) patented cell lines.
The first fact is quite indicative: the fact that the destruction of embryos to benefit some and not others explains the interest of some to deny the value of these embryos and to defend the "legitimacy" of their destruction for their own interests " scientists. "
But this is not enough to prove that the embryo deserves to be respected. Those who deny the very human identity of the accused embryos, as we said, their opponents will not be scientific, not to be serious. We ask ourselves: just scientists have a monopoly on the truth when it comes to defining what it means to be human? In a pluralistic world it would be logical to listen to everyone.
also believe that a mother and father have several frozen embryos can tell if a simple cluster of cells or for their children. Discover the relationship between these embryos and their parents gives us a new horizon of values, gives us a glimpse that these embryos are more than just a "handful of cells."
What if the parents have died or reject these embryos? There are also children abandoned by their parents (perhaps died in tragic circumstances) and are found by other adults. In these cases the corporation is involved in defense of abandoned children. Can not we raise awareness in society to defend the rejected embryos, frozen, treated in a gravely dangerous to their lives?

experiments that are ethically sound

Supporters of embryo research do not give up. Say, as we saw, that not using these embryos will cause a long delay for science, raise a barrier to self-autonomy obscurantist research.
We know, however, that science must accept ethical limits that can not be overcome without being dehumanized. Today, environmentalists have succeeded in respect to chimpanzees, rabbits and rats, they do not suffer, even to the detriment of scientific research. Is it less valuable to humans than chimpanzees? Is that a human embryo can be destroyed while it seems unfair that laboratories destroy eggs of birds in danger of extinction?
Humanity is faced with a debate of enormous importance. The defense of human embryos or underestimation faces two ways of looking at life and death, science and politics, human rights and the protection they deserve the weakest. Already there has been a huge injustice to the spread of abortion. Contempt embryos were placed under the same perspective of those who consider some humans as less important than others.
The defense of embryos and, consequently, the struggle to eradicate the injustice of abortion, are a challenge for people of good will. This implies, of course, some scientists are unable to carry out all experiments are on the agenda. Prohibit research involving destruction of human beings is not unfairly limit their freedom.
is simply show them the way of a true science ethics: what directs the use of their knowledge and money they receive from society to defend all human life, not to destroy some lives are seen as "less human ", even for the benefit of other human lives considered superior.
Thus his findings are based on respect for the weak, and may build a science that is really serving all people without exclusion or discrimination of any kind.

Article by Fernando Pascual
ForumLibertas.com and published in the 28/03/2011,
reproduced here due to its great interest.

Wart Remover For Seborrheic Keratosis

ELECTIONS IN PERU IN THE DECADE OF 1870

The 1860 Constitution and electoral law of 1861 laid the legal framework for presidential and parliamentary elections of early 1870. Articles 57 and 85 of the Constitution established the election of a third of the congress every two years and a new president every four. In accordance with this constitutional rule, three and six parliamentary elections took place between 1868 and 1878. The law of 1861 elections divided into three parts. In the first one the people elected delegates. In the second, the latter elected the new chairman and new members of Congress (one third of them were replaced every two years). In the third of the conference decided if the election of each new member and the president had been legal. The various parties and factions campaigning during the three phases of elections. In the 1870s the people elected delegates in October, they then elected the new members of Congress in November and the new president in May. The parliament took its final decision in July. This lengthy procedure was an important reason why the election had a long political dispute. Voters established by Article 38 of the Constitution of 1860 was very large. All males could vote more than 21 years of age who could read and write, or pay taxes, or possess a workshop or some land. Legally, most Peruvians adult males had the right to vote. Many artisans had a shop or plot of land outside cities, and many landless peasants as members of indigenous communities. However, we do not know how many people actually voted. There is no doubt that the municipal authorities in charge of registering voters did not respect the law, but rather trying to prevent political opponents from voting and refused to register them. Thus, the first objective of any party was to control the electoral register. Although no exact figures on voter turnout, all contemporaries agreed in 1871 that most adult males had the right to vote in general elections. This means that the Indians, who made nearly sixty percent of the population in 1876, were accepted as voters in them. You could not see this as something extraordinary, but as something normal. In the 1870 we see two major developments in the field of elections in our country: first, the lower and middle classes no longer content with the present electoral and social contacts, and demanded political representation. The participation of the masses was necessary to win elections, they wanted therefore be represented by one of their ranks. In 1871, the SIE (Club's most important electoral campaign of 1871-72 and the nucleus of the Civil Party, the largest political party in the next fifty years) just had seven artisans among its 272 founding members and the central board. Only one of them had a high position in the club. But in 1877, when two craftsmen ran as alternate members to the Chamber of Deputies, the Civil Party, arising out of the SIE, were endorsed. A few days before the two candidates were proclaimed, an assembly of craftsmen demanded that one of them to run for a seat in the House of Representatives, and not just as alternate. It was a novelty that artisans running for Congress because Unlike his predecessors and colleagues potential in him, it was manual labor. Finally, in 1878, Francisco Gonzalez, Cusco, became the first craftsman in Congress. Gonzalez had been by far the most popular candidate and respected in this city, but the Civil Party, which had a majority in parliament, opposed. As its candidate had been clearly defeated, the party leadership had to accept that it was "impossible" yet give victory to have a comfortable majority in Congress. Therefore decided to cancel the election in that department. To prevent this measure, craftsman offered to collaborate with civilians in parliament presented as guarantor Pedro José Tordoya, Bishop of Cusco. The party leadership accepted and Gonzalez entered the chamber of deputies. Second, the election campaigns of the 1870's became very long and costly. Even the wealthy men refrained from apply for fear of wasting your money without winning. In 1877, for example, estimated the campaign in Lima four candidates backed by the Civil Party would cost 60.000 soles. No one wanted to spend 15.000 soles. Therefore, half the money had to be achieved through donations. Summary paper entitled: Elections and political participation in nineteenth-century Peru: the presidential campaign of 1871-72 - Author: Ulrich Mücke

ACTIVITIES:

1. MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF INFORMATION:

Select the most important information contained in this work using the following address:

http://portal.jne.gob.pe/informacioninstitucional/escuelaelectoral/Martes% 20Electorales% 20 -% 20Exposiciones/ee2005/Exp_HistoriaProcElect.pdf

prepared an outline entitled: Elections in the 1870 Who could vote?. He adds additional data to enrich your work) for example, why it was important to get the vote of a particular social group, who were excluded, etc..).

2. CRITICAL THINKING:

a) Do you think the presidential elections in the 1870's were very or little exclusive? Why?

b) Currently, unlike nineteenth-century elections, all persons are entitled to vote, including (as) illiterate (as). Do you think the votes of these people can be manipulated? Why?

c) The recent Peruvian women get their right to vote in elections in mid-twentieth century (in 1955 during the administration of President Odría), do you think it is important women's participation in the electoral process? Why?

Cyst In Testicals Skin

Congress on Gender Ideology

9-11/II/2011 The day was held the First International Conference on Gender Ideology (IG) at the University of Navarra.Dada expose the importance of the issue then some of the things said in that conference as the press has picked up:

-IG denies that mankind is differentiated between man and nature that are mujeres.Niega ebtre differences but they both relate to cultural constructions, which, therefore, can be modified as desired by each individuo.Han replaced the concept of sexual difference by the indefinite term "gender" (gender). They have taken the sfirmación of Simone de Beauvoir, "Woman is not born, ago. "

-IG arises in the decade of the twentieth century 60's in the environment of radical feminism (gender) americano.Tras the fall of the Berlin Wall that feminism being built as a utopian ideology that was sent to the utopia of equality of "scientific socialism". The theory of "gender" (gender) denies sexual difference and affirms the rights of choice individual.La IG is one of the drifts the Marxist utopia of equality.

"The current social trnsformación moves toward the elimination of all differences (including those between men and women), based mainly on the dissemination of oral contraceptives (OCs) for separating sexuality and reproduction.

"If sexual identities are just buildings, it is possible to deconstruct them, and this is what they propose to do women's movements of "gender" and homosexuals.

"The key to the revolution of" gender "is the language changing some terms:" parent "instead of mother and father," parenting "instead of family, sex is replaced by" sexuality "and sexed by" sexual " ... to confirm that it has no reality, only the orientation of desire ...

"The IG has been welcomed in international organizations (ONU. ..) because it is the policy of expanding rights individuales.La" gender mainstreaming "has been the ideological line adopted by major UN agencies and NGOs dealing with population control.

unfounded "Besides, the IG implies a very dangerous political views, giving the impression that the difference discriminación.La stands for true equality, however, is true not only when the same subjects are treated equally but also when different subjects are treated equally (as Church says no gender feminism).

"In Spain is experiencing the legislative implementation of the IG since 2004 with the government of Zapatero: free abortion, gay marriage, sex change without even going under the knife ... are some of the laws driven gobierno.Y by all this legislation is trying to impose on the conscience of people and, through the course EPC is intended to take a younger audience this ideology (through a nasty manipulaci''on)

"But he has also stated in Congress that are solutions to the IG:
. Derogating in Spain (where the sign change policy of our government) laws
harmful to society. redirecting the laudable goals that they are pursuing other laws (igualdad. ..) and dispossess its
ideological contamination. sustain the struggle against the sectarian subject EpC ... etc. .. .
etc. And all this requires personal commitment and the mobilization of broad sectors of society that do not support the ideological manipulation of the Zapatero government (one of the most disastrous and inept characters in the history of Spain)

Hen Does M&b Warband Come Out?

Letter from a child who was never born

Mama, though you never wanted my birth, I can not stop writing mamá.Te call from heaven to explain how happy I was since I live in your birth vientre.Yo wanted to know, I thought that one day would become a happy child, I dreamed of going to school and see when born sonreir.Yo thought everyone would be glad of my birth, but you did not think same as me ... I felt something very strange that I could not explain, something that made me tremble and I felt I took away the life I wanted to defend myself, but I could not mom, was so small and so weak that I had no strength to quejarme.La criminal death surprised me when I played in your womb and live quererte.Entonces thought I knew who took the life of me, tell me, Mom: qien could get inside me to kill me?, " Quie was, Mom?, where were you defendistes.No I do not know, Mom, what I got to thinking ...

Sorry, Mom, but for a moment I thought you could only be you ... but no, excuse my bad thought: how was I to think that a mother killed her son at home so small when the cat does not harass or or the TV?. Now Mom and I see everything, I'm here in the next world with a partner the same fortune yo.Me said yes, it was you. How could you, Mom?. How could you think you would not be able to buy the dishwasher with my expenses?. Someone advised and will escuchastes before your heart.and had so many dreams ... and you to me quitastes all, those illusions about being a good son to you ...

You know, Mom?. Yesterday I was talking to God and asked him to clarify the truth about my muerte.El hugged me and told me so many beautiful things ... The most encouraging words I ever said that only escuchado.Me he is the master of my life and that nobody had a right would hojos fell quitármela.Por my God lágrimas.Pero rivers hugged me and said tenderly, my little boy
... but ... if you have no mother, I'll give you mine.
... and taught me
the Virgin Mary has given me everything you negaste.Mi me earth mother rejected me, but now I have another in the cielo.Se called Mary and is the mother of Jesus.

Mom, now I leave you with affection dfe, asking you to repent of what you did with me, you confess your sin and not do it again asks jamás.Te your child never born ...

Letter written by: Emilia
Cortina Castellón (Valencia)

Handmade Wooden Spoons

Chemical Abortion

* is that induced by administering a drug and not peocedimientos quirúrgicos.La ethical rating is identical in both cases but the chemical abortion (AQ) is (according to its promoters) more "discreet" less
"aggressive" and, in principle, can not require admission hospitalario.Por all, is the least noticeable and is not so social rejection as abortion
classic ("unseeing eyes ..."), so the society can accept more
facility, which is what intended by the use of "pills" for its induction.
exconsellera
* The Health of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Socialist Marina Gelli) has been preparing a plan for young women loa from 16 years to abort at home through AQ.De This is intended to further reduce health expenditures and income hospitalarios.Todo
"perfect" except for "small detail": the AQ also destroyed innocent human life (it is a murder.) Catalan government's current plan put in place immediately.

* What "pills" are those that have abortifacient?:

1.Mifepristona (RU 486): inhibits the action of progesterone and stops
(by this mechanism) a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus, being
"effective" until day 49 of amenorrea.Se a single dose of 600mg
orally and 36-48 hours after administering a prostaglandin
favors the expulsion of the embryo previously detached from the uterine wall.
is not free of possible side effects (vaginal bleeding, uterine bleeding ...), contraindications (suspected ectopic pregnancy ...) and can be dangerous in certain circumstances
(anemia, bleeding disorders, renal failure Hepaticae ... )

2.Levonorgestrel ("Morning After Pill" PDD) was presented officially as "contraceptive emergengia" but also acts as an abortifacient in 50% of cases preimplantation inducing an abortion (before the embryo! a human life, "has nestled in the womb. In some ways
refuses the abortifacient effect of the PDD based on artificial and unscientific definition (and not accepted by many doctors) of pregnancy that made the Cairo Conference in 1998 (and subsequently adopted by WHO) indicating that the
pregnancy begins when the embryo implants in the útero.Esta definition is political and manipulative
without any scientific basis to be accepted (any medical dictionary or the SAR defines gestures as ... "lead and support the mother in her gut the living fruit of conception until birth. ")
But even admitting that pregnancy begins when the embryo implnta in the uterus, the PDD (for one of their mechanisms of action) would produce an abortion
preimplantation (destruction of life before implantation in the uterus).
The PDD is therefore also an abortifacient, and the girl, she has a right to know! (Because it changes its ethical rating if it were only about contraception, it also is). The height of cynicism is, therefore, when
certain health claim that "thanks" to the PDD are reduced abortions.

(For more information on this aspect suggest reading other articles on this blog on the PDD)

Polly Pocket Za Curice Od 6 Godina

embryos and human dignity

• is evidence current scientific life begins at fertilization . The zygote (single cell embryo) is a new biological reality, different from their parents. The new man has inherited 23 chromosomes from the father and 23 from the mother. Unca their genetic identity and unique.
The zygote is the first physical reality of human life, every individual of our species . It is, as has been pointed out by some scientist, "the exact point in space and time in which a human individual starts its own life cycle"
• As written by Professor Jouve, Professor of Genetics: "Every life human life is unique, belonging to the species Homo sapiens, not leaps from fertilization to death, so the embryo and fetus (the early stages of life) are biologically comparable to the newborn and adult. This is the same being the same person, the only thing that differentiates them is a temporary phenomenon that should not become crucial to establish different categories in the same individual "
All scientists as well as textbooks of embryology, genetics ... a resounding claim that the embryo is a human individual from the moment of fertilization
• The cell is defined by the Cell Biology and unity of life. The human zygote (single cell embryo) is therefore unity of life and as a carrier in its genome Alu sequences (specific to the human species) is a human life. But this statement (true for the zygote) may also be applied to any other human cell. So ... what does the zygote different from other cells? . The difference is that the zygote is a totipotent cell and blastomeres of the early embryo until it is 8 / 16 cells (other cells are pluripotent or mutipotentes)
• The zygote (cell totipotent) is the only one that "contains" as each and every one of the structures that constitute the individual of the human species . If permitted development will generate all the structures that make up the individual. Throughout this development there is no substantial change, no qualitative change, no "before and after"
• The individual that was generated after the union of gametes is maintained until his death, is always the same individual who will showing different aspects throughout his life, but its genome is always the same as was established at fertilization.
we face the zygote to an individual of the human species unicellular state. All structures are "contained" in the zygote and in it there is life in action (not in power, as some argue)

• The embryo is a cluster of undifferentiated cells, but something that exists and due to an ongoing project of life. After the first cell division of zygote generates two-cell embryo, and each has a commitment to differentiation and different (one will emerge the placenta and other stem cells and embryonic layers after). Thus, from the first cell division there is a commitment to differentiation different. It can be concluded therefore that the embryo in its early stages of development is not an undifferentiated group of cells.
• And when human life began, it has a special value expressed in the recognition of their "dignity" (being endowed with very special characteristics that differentiate and rise above all other beings of nature)
• The new being (the result of fertilization) is and human life and therefore life personal.
No one is a person for expressing certain personal qualities, but these will manifest because it is a person. A grave error is to associate the existence of personal life with the manifestation of some of its features. When a person sleeps is comatose or anesthetized person ... but still not express their cognitive abilities.
deny personhood has been used to justify aberrations: slavery, elimination of human beings (Jews ...) and now abortion or embryo manipulation
Put another way: in the early periods of life may not appear clear rational element of human life that distinguishes this from other seres.Pero be wise not to demonstrate rationally but to have the rational capacity, may or may not manifest. Rationality will
attached to being an individual of the species humana.Por therefore the sole criterion to determine whether he is worthy of respect is to find out if a living human being (easily checked today).
Arguably, for all that, that man is a being particularly worthy of attention and respect by being rational ... regardless of their stage of development, intellectual ability, age, health or sickness
• Therefore and by way of summary : The embryo at the zygote stage is a human being because 1 / is a new agency, 2 / belongs to the human biological, 3 / is a body set and 4 / her growth and development occurs in a coordinated, continuous and gradual.
And ... how could a human individual not be a human person? . The human being "is" person under his rational nature. No "becomes" a person for possession of certain properties, the effective exercise of certain functions. What is important for the recognition of personhood is the membership (by nature) to the rational human species, regardless of outward manifestation of certain characteristics. No one is "more or less person." Therefore
: science and philosophy claim that the embryo is a HUMAN BEING and a HUMAN BEING (and hence their dignity, support not be destroyed or manipulated, as if it were only "a few cells")

- Recommended Reading:
"codes of life." M. López Barahona and JCAbellán.Editorial Homole-gens, 2009
"Basic Issues of bioethics." (P.81: Beginning of human life). A.Pardo.Ediciones Rialp, 2010
"dignity of life and death. N.Jouve.En: bioeticaweb.com ,6-4-2011.

Performa Of Wedding Card

Abortion and Slavery: Similar arguments

The Washington Post published a few years ago realidades.El similarity between the two parallel story is worth transcribing asombroso.Vale part, comparing the arguments of the supporters of slavery (E) with current pro-abortion (A):

(E) : Even if you have a heart and a brain and be considered biologically human, the slave is not "a person" under the law.
(A) : Even if you have a heart and a brain and be considered biologically human, the unborn child is not "a person" to her law.

(E): A black man gets his personality only to be released, before we should not worry about him because he has no right under the law.
(A): A child only acquires personality legal at birth, before we should not worry about him because he has no rights under the law.

(E): If you believe that slavery is wrong, no one forces you to have a slave, but do not impose their morality on others.
(A): If you believe abortion is wrong, no one forces you to do, but do not impose their morality on others.

(E): A man has the right to do whatever he wants with his property.
(A): A woman has the right would do what he wants with his body.

The abolition of slavery was a positive milestone in the history of mankind and now produces blush just thinking about its existence. Also come a day when unjust laws are abolished allowing abortion.

Monica Roccaforte 2010

* As discussed previously in an article in this blog entitled "Embryo and Human Dignity" (see), the zygote is the first human cell of any individual and marks the moment of new life.

* What distinguishes the zygote of any other human cells: the fact that a totipotent cell.
There is scientific evidence that the zygote is a new living being, belonging to the human species and is, therefore, a new persona.Algunos, sim, however, oppose this objection twins identical twins.

* If a zygote, they say, may be two embryos (through a division that takes place before day 14 of life) is not possible to say that the zygote is an individual, because this could be dos.Y argumrnto is could argue that human life started from day 14 of concepción.El twinning problem, they say, could be a barrier to defend the personal status of the embryo.

* What is twinning?: The division of the zygote into two embryos before implantation in the uterus and, of course, both have the same DNA (there are two people IDET).
The twinning is possible because the embryonic cells retain their ability totipotent in the first moments and the error of division can give rise to two separate individuals (this happens in 0.2% of pregnancies). In these cases, from the moment that is lost when the embryo totipotency can guarantee the uniqueness of the individual.

* We can therefore say that until day 14 is not possible to know whether the zygote results in a single individual or two, but that does not reveal what is there before the 14 th day life is not humana.No because let's say from one moment there are two lives we can conclude that what I had before was not human life.! Of course it is!: what else could it be?.

* To better understand The issue before us is to distinguish between individuality and the twinning phenomenon unicidad.El only means that genetic individuality does not mean the indivisibility, at least 0.2% of casos.Además, the fact of a division is not possible merely supports the continued development of embrión.Las two identities arising from this fact agree in their genetic identity because they come from a single zygote, but thong this point of separation are restructured as different individuals.

* The destruction of embryos (from the perspective of the twinning) presents an ethical problem even worse, because what is destroyed is not only a human life, but potentially more than one.

(The contents of this article has been extracted from an excellent job on the blog "Bioethics Today: bioeticahoy.com.es the 22-XII-2010.Autor: Agustín Losada)

Antec Vs Cooler Master Psu

twinning embryos and Around Gender Ideology

(Summary chapter IG of the book "In Defense of the family." Author: Benigno Blanco.Editorial: Espasa, 2010).
masterfully the author discusses in this chapter what the IG, whose main ideas and comments are summarized below:

* It is important to distinguish between feminism (movement to equal rights between women and the man, something just ) and GI (ideology or worldview that seeks to void the distinction between man and wife, itself absurd and perverse in its consequences.

* IG emerged in the mid-60's: the new feminist (radical, gender) and not talk about sex but gender and state that women's liberation is only achieved when disappearance of the distinction between man and woman . They raise the class struggle between the oppressors (men) and the oppressed class (women).

* They say that in terms of sexuality there is nothing that is natural: everything is a construction be modified to release the mujerdebe voluntad.Para articulated a society in which masculine and feminine but not relevant to sexual freedom, diversity affective sexual unrelated to the two sexes clásicos.Es say there is no male nor female, but a cultural product that is continually changing (and each one chooses at each stage of life their "identity" sexual, others must recognize and accept)

* What do you mean feminism gender: feminine aims to end by overcoming the distinction between men and women in all walks of life.and male nor female: just gender (affective-sexual orientation is creating a freely as you mood and can change throughout your life). And to close the gap between man and woman is essential to end the marriage and the family (structures of oppression of women according to this ideology).
is intended ultimately to achieve a classless society sexos.Y to insist on this thing called "deconstruction": the meaning of language change, rewrite history, ethics and redo and redo law sexuality as outside the male-female duality and detached from reproduction.

* The IG has and seeks to impose its own terminología.Así, speaks of "gender" rather than "sex" because it indicates the cultural construction of gender, free and own staff sexualidad.Utiliza the term "emotional-sexual orientation "Instead of talking about men and mujeres.El term" homophobia "is unusual in its language to attack those who disagree their points of vista.La term "reproductive rights" involves a systematic attack on the vida.Hablan of "polymorphous sexuality" to indicate that any type of sexual practice is equally valid ......

* The IG has its own political agenda in our country, we see embodied in the legislative process Zapatero since 2004: Gender Violence Act, Act of gay marriage, "express divorce" law techniques assisted reproduction law on biomedical research, law governing transsexuality and the recent law on abortion.

* And what about the "thinkers" of the IG?. Most ended up committing suicide or in mental hospitals because the IG is a destructive spiral that affects not only society but their own "intellectual". The biographies of the leading theoreticians (W. Reich, A. Kinsey, G. Bataille, M. Foucoult,
M. Sanger , M. Mead, S. Firestone, K. Millett, G. Greer .....) are riddled with self-destructive episodes that reveal the moral rot of their minds disturbed (Weekly ALBA 31-XII-2010).

* The worst thing in Spain is that Zapatero's government wants this destructive ideology dominate the new education law under which liability must educate our hijos.El English socialism of the XXI century to follow the guidelines of the sickly intellectuals of the IG, destroys the foundations of human dignity ( especially women), destroying vital institutions of society (marriage and family).

* The book's author ends his discussion of the IG exposing very suggestive aspects on how to fight tells the IG, to encourage everyone to be read.

* Further reading:
-La ideolgía of género.J.Trillo-Figueroa.Ed.LibrosLibres, 2009
-Gender ideology (brochure). SOSFamilia, 2010 (sosfamilia.es)
-Male and female he created . CEE.2004 Document (conferenciaepiscopal.es)
-Apostolic Letter Mulieris Dignitatem, "John Paul II
Christian in today's society (DVD). Goya Producciones, 2008 (goyaproducciones.es)
-Ideology gender or gender as a tool poder.J.Scala.Ed.Sekotia, 2011
-See also other entries on this subject in this blog

Shannon Whirry Body Of Influence

need training to defend vida.Conoce and select the addresses that are most may interest you:

* derechoavivir.org (life: English pro-life movement)
* profesionalesetica.org (education, family and life): 620,466,175
* grupodepadres.es (family)
* peoplecanchange.com (homosexuality, English and English)
* forumlibertas.com (thematic diverse society)
* madrina.org (helps pregnant women)
* fundacionvida.net (life, helps mothers)
* Forofamilia.org (education, family and life: family English Forum)
* provida.es (English federation associations pro)
* observatoriobioetica.com (Life Sciences Institute UCValencia)
* sosfamilia.es (family and life )
* cidevida.org (international center pro)
* españaeducaenlibertad.org (education, family, education for citizenship)
* agea.net (several current issues)
* hazteoir.org (cross-thematic Civic Platform)
* ivaf . org (Valencian Institute of the family)
* aebioetica.org (bioethics)
* biogandia.blogspot.com (bioethics)
* bioeticaweb.com (bioethics on the network)
* bioeticahoy.com.es (bioethics)
* aciprensa.com / abortion (Catholic World News: anything related to abortion)
* interrogantes.net (current affairs, Christian values)
* sontushijos.org (family)
* objetores.org: Parents platform in defense of freedom of education
* españaeducaenlibertad.org: excellent website for the freedom of education
* conferenciaepiscopal.es / derechoalavida (Documents EEC)
* conferenciaepiscopal.es / apoyoalavida (institutions helps families)
* casablan.org (new books, DVD ...)
* educacionypersona.es (Defence Association / improvement of education)
* fundacionprodis.org (people with intellectual disabilities)
* vozvictimas.org (women victims of abortion: 24 hours attention)
* nomassilencio.com (problems in women after abortion)
* librosjuveniles.blogspot.com (read youth)
* redmadre.es (help pregnant women)
* libertaddigital.com (current issues)
* analisisdigital.com (current issues)
* hayalternativas.org (platform for life)
* educarhoy.org (family)
* investigadoresyprofesionales.org ( life: scientific, CIVIC)
* nomassilencio.com (testimony of women who have aborted)
* redfarmaciaresponsable.org (pharmaceuticals)
* andoc.es (association conscientious objection defense)
* madrid11.com (World Youth Day)
* philosophica.info (encyclopedia of philosophy in the network)
* analisiseutanasia.blogspot.com (issues related to euthanasia)
* jpvida.blogspot.com (young prolife)
* aulafamiliar.org (family counseling center)
* porlafamiliacristiana.com (family)
* vidahumana.org (Human Life International: excellent web! get to know it!)
* adevida.org (Spain: association in defense of life)
* comiteprovida.org (Mexico: National Committee pro)
* derchoalavida.org (cool videos, refers to "international human life")
* derechoavivir.org (movement English pro)
* porlavida.org Association (no more abortions)
* elembarazo.net (all information about pregnancy: excellent)
* padresycolegios.com (family, education)
* soloparajovenes.org (topics of special interest young)
* iglesia.org (Catholic websites with extensive information)
* bsocial.gva.es / masvida / portal (Generalitat Valenciana: program (+) helps life of the pregnant woman) and your attention: 900,854,800
* woombesp.com: World Organization Ovulation Method of Billing in Spain
* mobbingmaternal.org: aid to pregnant women who suffer harassment (902,323,329)
* embarazoinesperado.es: attention a pregnant woman in difficulty (900,500,505)
* unidosporlavida.org: excellent web in defense of life, helps pregnant women and comprehensive list of links
* joaquinferrer.es: questions about the meaning of science, faith relations science, creation and evolution ...


This list supports suggestions for other directions of interest in the defense of education, family life .....

Monica Roccaforte News 2010

Bioethics Education Network "Dignitas Personae"

• by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (09/08/2008) and expressly approved by Pope Benedict XVI confirms and updates the Instruction "Donum Vitae" (22/02/1987). Responds new issues in the field of bioethics and promotes the formation of consciences, encouraging biomedical research respects the dignity of every human being and procreation.
• begins with the words Dignitas personae-the dignity , which must recognize every human being from conception to death natural.Se addressed to Christians and all who seek will verdad.No against scientific progress but seeks to prevent abuses of the Church today ciencia.La feel the duty to give voice to those who do not have it and appeals to all people of good will to defend the fragile human condition in the early stages of life (as once assumed the defense of workers).
• is structured in three parts :
• anthropological, theological and ethical critical
• New issues regarding procreation
• New procedures involving the manipulation of embryos or human genetic
• Both fundamental principles are:
• "The human being must be respected and treated as a person from the moment of conception and, therefore, from that moment he must recognize the rights of individuals, primarily the right inviolability of all innocent human life "
• " The Origin of Life ..... is their true context in marriage and family, which is generated by an act which expresses the mutual love between man and truly responsible procreation mujer.Una with whom he has birth is the fruit of marriage "
• The second part deals with very topical issues: technical aid to fertility, in vitro fertilization and the deliberate destruction of embryos, freezing of embryos, preimplantation diagnosis, new forms of interception and contragestation (pill .....)..... postcoital
• The last part is devoted to gene therapy, human cloning, therapeutic use of cells stem ..... among other things also highly topical
• reading instruction is highly recommended for all persons interested in or concerned with bioethics, it is advisable also to re-read the encyclical "Evangelium Vitae" of Pope John Paul II.