* The "Act of sexual and reproductive health and abortion" (Organic Law 2 / 2010, to March 3) will enter into force on 5-July -2010.Contempla, in addition to free abortion, sex education compulsory in all schools and from a "gender perspective", ie focusing on promiscuity and the standardization of any sexual practice (and it is easy to imagine his perverse and aberrant content)
* Given the enormous gravity of the issue is necessary to mobilize, inform and improve our training in aspects just exponer.Nos Was, therefore, of great interest to recommend the reading and study of an excellent paper published by the English Episcopal Conference (EEC) on 17-June-2009 removed all the arguments of the government to approve / justify this ley.El document title is: Declaration on the draft "law on abortion" threaten the lives of those who will be born, become "right" .
We present below a brief summary of the master document (full content available on the website of the CEE: conferenciaepiscopal.es )
1. The mere wish of the mother canceled (under the new law) the right to life of the unborn.
This aspect is perhaps the most serious of the Act the first 14 weeks, the mother decides on the death of the unborn: the violation of the right to life is treated as if it were a right.
Recalls the paper that "the rights relative to life is not granted by the state, but a prior right to it ... that the State has an obligation to protect" What
the sense of right would put time limits to life if it begins at the moment of fertilization?: why within 14 weeks?, why not a little earlier or a little later?
should also be remembered that abortion (as Vatican II) is an "abominable crime"
2.'s Health as an excuse to eliminate (through week 22) to which they are born.
This means, in practice, abortion on demand until week 22 and is a serious misrepresentation because abortion is never matar.El abortion cure but also may seriously harm the physical and psychological mujer.Todo is a big lie and the woman is the injured
3. It denies or devalues human beings to justify their removal.
Without any scientific base fragments the length of gestation in three installments, as if before a certain point the fetus is not a being humano.Ello goes against scientific evidence and the English case (art. 15 of the Constitution and Case 53/1985 of 11 April TC)
4. It does not rely on women to save the trauma of abortion and its serious consequences (which are intensified in people who have not yet reached sufficient maturity: adolescent children ...)
not provide aid to women so they can make the decision not to abort, but everything contrario.Y not taken into account at all, the figure of father.
5. Is left to the individual's life to be born, rather than recognizing it as a fundamental elememto establishing the common good that deserves protection and promotion.
6. Education (as we noted at the beginning), orchestrated in the service of abortion.
This law also imposes a moral sex education and abortion is based on the principles of the "ideology of gender" (contrary to the Constitution, which in its art. 27-3 guarantees the freedom of parents to choose the education they want for their children)
ABORTION AND SLAVERY (author's final comments of the blog): In the middle of the nineteenth century human beings have U.S. looked as normal as having heads ganado.La acceptance of slavery was assumed by the Southern Americans and abolitionists favored only break a social scourge as brutal.
Today history repeats itself in many countries: it speaks of the right to kill unborn children (that is abortion), but more and more people (branded as extremists by the 'liberal') oppose brutalidad.Llegará such a day that will be the ethical degradation of a society that kills its unborn helpless children and abortionists of today are ashamed of having acted as perversamente.Y as in the case of slavery the right end imposed.
And we finish these comments going to recommend the magnificent Documet of the EEC on the new abortion law (also known as "law Aido)
0 comments:
Post a Comment